PHI scorers
Attack edge
PHI
Possession
55% - 45%
Derived from
match feed
NEW scorers
No scorer
Compact game flow built from official team stats and player performance lines.
Performance ledger
| Player | Rtg | Min | G/A | Shots | KP | Duels | Def |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.50 | 90 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 8/10 | 2 | |
Attack pressure
shots + on target + key passes + corners
Shot accuracy
on target share
Pass security
team completion rate
Defensive volume
tackles + interceptions + blocks
Duel win rate
duels won / total
Discipline load
fouls + card weight
Best-rated, creator, ball-winner and shot threat for each side.
Philadelphia Union
4-4-2 · 0/9 bench used
Best rated
Nathan Lee William Harriel
7.5 rating · 90 min
Chance maker
Kai Harley Wagner
4 key passes
Ball winner
Quinn Krippendorff Sullivan
8 duels won · 4 actions
Shot threat
Milan Iloski
0/3 on target
New England Revolution
3-5-1-1 · 0/9 bench used
Best rated
James Tanner Beason
7.3 rating · 90 min
Chance maker
Carles Gil de Pareja Vicent
3 key passes
Ball winner
James Tanner Beason
6 duels won · 8 actions
Shot threat
Tomás Alejandro Chancalay
1/2 on target
Philadelphia UnionNew England RevolutionGoals, cards and substitutions in a single chronological rail.
PHINEW| 7.30 |
| 90 |
| 0/0 |
| 0/0 |
| 4 |
| 4/10 |
| 2 |
| 7.30 | 30 | 0/1 | 0/3 | 2 | 3/4 | 1 |
| 7.30 | 13 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2 | 2/3 | 2 |
| 7.00 | 90 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 2 | 8/16 | 4 |
| 7.00 | 82 | 0/0 | 0/0 | -- | 3/6 | 3 |
| 6.90 | 90 | 0/0 | 0/2 | -- | 3/8 | 2 |
| 6.90 | 8 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 2/5 | 2 |
Performance ledger
| Player | Rtg | Min | G/A | Shots | KP | Duels | Def |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.30 | 90 | 0/0 | 0/0 | -- | 6/10 | 8 | |
| 7.20 | 90 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3 | 6/13 | -- | |
| 6.90 | 89 | 0/0 | 0/0 | -- | 3/7 | 6 | |
| 6.90 | 90 | 0/0 | 0/1 | -- | 5/11 | 1 | |
| 6.90 | 10 | 0/0 | 0/1 | -- | 2/2 | 1 | |
| 6.70 | 18 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 0/0 | -- | |
| 6.60 | 89 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 3/9 | 3 | |
| 6.60 | 11 | 0/0 | 1/2 | -- | 0/2 | -- |
